A

AIA CES Credits
AV Office
Abstract Publication
Academic Calendar, Columbia University
Academic Calendar, GSAPP
Admissions Office
Advanced Standing Waiver Form
Alumni Board
Alumni Office
Anti-Racism Curriculum Development Award
Architecture Studio Lottery
Assistantships
Avery Library
Avery Review
Avery Shorts

S

STEM Designation
Satisfactory Academic Progress
Skill Trails
Student Affairs
Student Awards
Student Conduct
Student Council (All Programs)
Student Financial Services
Student Health Services at Columbia
Student Organization Handbook
Student Organizations
Student Services Center
Student Services Online (SSOL)
Student Work Online
Studio Culture Policy
Studio Procedures
Studio-X Global Network
Summer Workshops
Support GSAPP
Close
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice Group 6
Three square-shaped open-roof light red brick structures on a light brown background with a grid scaffold roof operating as a connection among them.

Welcome to Grant Gardens

How can the two systems at Morningside Gardens and Grant Houses together reflect collective ownership, such that one becomes less public and the other less private? How can we draw on structural similarities for a post plantation future?

The project attempts to answer these questions by understanding the similarities and differences between the two projects and inferring the opportunities for intervention. Our first observation on site was that the double agents of decoy and doubling start becoming apparent at the ground level of the projects. We took this as the starting point of our design, asking how these systems of control on the ground level could be subverted and how the two communities could be brought together to generate collective value. We approached this by designing a new system through networks that support each other like community kitchens, farms, retail spaces, and eateries that weave into public as well as domestic spaces. We employ architectural as well as placemaking devices to work toward this, including ways for children to interact, depending on the lack of direct biases in their lived experience to try and bring one generation together. Zooming in on the buildings, we question how two completely different architectural languages and what they imply can be reconciled in a way that they too, contribute to subverting plantation logics. Ultimately, we envision this system being adopted in public housing projects across New York City, enabling communities to be better integrated within their larger neighborhoods.

Arch wilson dhruvalakshminarayanan sanoberkhan fa21 02 site plan