A

AIA CES Credits

AV Office

Abstract Publication

Academic Affairs

Academic Calendar, Columbia University

Academic Calendar, GSAPP

Admissions Office

Advanced Standing Waiver Form

Alumni Board

Alumni Office

Architecture Studio Lottery

Assistantships

Avery Library

Avery Review

Avery Shorts

S

STEM Designation

Satisfactory Academic Progress

Scholarships

Skill Trails

Student Affairs

Student Awards

Student Conduct

Student Council (All Programs)

Student Financial Services

Student Health Services at Columbia

Student Organization Handbook

Student Organizations

Student Services Center

Student Services Online (SSOL)

Student Work Online

Studio Culture Policy

Studio Procedures

Summer Workshops

Support GSAPP

Close
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice Group 6
#<ActiveModel::Error:0x00007d9531c0ce90>

Where the Sidewalk Ends: A Spatial Analysis of Vision Zero Implementation in Eastern Queens

Project by David Marvin @david.a.marvin

This project evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of New York City’s Vision Zero program in Eastern Queens, focusing on NYC Council Districts 19 and 23. Using ACS demographic and commuting data, Vision Zero intervention layers, and NYC Crash Mapper datasets from 2012 to 2014 and 2022 to 2024, the study applies spatial analysis techniques including choropleth mapping and kernel density estimation to examine relationships between vehicle ownership, commuting behavior, infrastructure investment, and crash outcomes over time. Findings show that the auto-oriented, affluent, and politically conservative districts of CD 19 and 23 continue to experience persistently high per-capita crash rates alongside relatively limited Vision Zero infrastructure investment. Persistent crash hotspots and resistance to street redesigns suggest that implementation barriers, political opposition, and municipal prioritization methodologies may constrain the reach of life-saving safety interventions, even in communities with substantial political influence and available resources.