AIA CES Credits
AV Office
Abstract Publication
Academic Affairs
Academic Calendar, Columbia University
Academic Calendar, GSAPP
Admissions Office
Advanced Standing Waiver Form
Alumni Board
Alumni Office
Anti-Racism Curriculum Development Award
Architecture Studio Lottery
Avery Library
Avery Review
Avery Shorts


STEM Designation
Satisfactory Academic Progress
Skill Trails
Student Affairs
Student Awards
Student Conduct
Student Council (All Programs)
Student Financial Services
Student Health Services at Columbia
Student Organization Handbook
Student Organizations
Student Services Center
Student Services Online (SSOL)
Student Work Online
Studio Culture Policy
Studio Procedures
Summer Workshops
Support GSAPP
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice Group 6
Section Model of a residence with pink and white walls with multiple grey staircases. A reading area is on the ground level and a bath and bedroom are located above.

Topographies of Homecoming

In a housing lecture, Anne Lacaton states: “Housing is everywhere. Housing is here. Housing is in the school. Housing is in the city. ‘Inhabiting’ is situations to be well in any place of the city.” The architect’s most challenging objective is “to make the city comfortable and full of pleasures.” Yet, if the essence of inhabitation is comfort—a phenomenon which, though magnetic, goes largely unnoticed in one’s day-to-day affairs—they must acknowledge the varied forms in which these moments of dwelling materialize. This project accordingly posits that the everyday architectural notions of “dwelling” and “home” are grounded in a more original “existential spatiality,” a precognitive familiarity with the significance and interrelatedness of things that one implicitly navigates in involvements or moods. Consequently, a dwelling unit’s performativity must be sought in its deference to this latter, fuller notion that encompasses the extent of everyday lived space. In contrast to the modernist performative dwelling, the so-called “machine for living in,” that pursued a cold and homogeneous approach to housing, the project proposes that respecting the human spectrum of atmospheric and emotional needs will increase feelings of comfort and familiarity that could ward off anxiety and homelessness.